Businesses, industries, state utility commissions, utility companies, especially electric power providers, and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are “hell-bent” on pushing the ultimate in surveillance and control technology, the Internet of Things (IoT) that will operate on the new 5G broadband platform and network(s), which use much smaller microwave ‘towers’ placed very close to each other.

Why so close?  Because 5G is harder to get into buildings to operate all those smart appliances consumers covet and controllers want us to use in order to track our in-home activities 24/7/365, all under the false pretense of saving consumers either time or money, while providing the utmost in supposed conveniences.  However, surveillance is the prime agenda destined to become the intended way of life globally; just check out the UN’s Agendas 21 and 2030.


Here is a nicely illustrated pdf file explaining the IoT and how it will help consumers become integrated into the critical “smart city” paradigm.

[embeddoc url=”http://files.www.whatissmartgrid.org/evolution/SECC_Internet_of_Things_Infographic.pdf” download=”all”]

Source: https://smartenergycc.org/?mc_cid=6bfcf63d78&mc_eid=42a5b07e40

However, there’s one glaringly huge missing puzzle piece of specific scientific information regarding human health and safety issues pertaining to 5G, especially since no studies about health and environmental impacts have been done to date that I know of regarding any of the microwave generations (“G”) [1,2,3,4 and 5] technologies.

Shouldn’t safety studies for such invasive—the waves penetrate body tissues—technologies be mandated to be published with all advertising promotions? Check your cell phone manual fine print to read what’s there.  How about that FCC?

5G is being rolled out with a ‘religious, faith-like-basis’ steeped in consensus science that it works without harming humans, animals, plant life and the environment!  But such scientific fact really has not been proven scientifically and, therefore, must be taken to task by consumers and regulatory agencies.

5G has the ability to penetrate the skin causing a sunburn-like-tingling and, if close enough in range to certain Gigahertz frequencies, 5G can cook an egg or cook an eye!  What will it do to the human brain, which is mostly cholesterol [1] and water (about 73%)?

Microwaves interact with and excite water molecules causing cellular and DNA [5] disruptions. Microwaves also send out non-thermal radiation waves, which are documented to cause electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) [2], plus activating voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) [3].  Microwaves also are known to breach the Blood Brain Barrier [4] thereby causing toxins and chemicals to cross into the brain—something Nature never intended.

According to EMF/RF researcher Arthur Firstenberg,

So far the FCC has approved bands of frequencies around 24 GHz, 28 GHz, 38 GHz, 39 GHz, and 48 GHz for use in 5G stations, and is proposing to add 32 GHz, 42 GHz, 50 GHz, 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, and above 95 GHz to the soup. These have tiny wavelengths and require tiny antennas. At 48 GHz, an array of 1,024 antennas will measure only 4 inches square.

Consumers need to keep in mind the following regarding Gigahertz (GHz):

One GHz is equal to one billion Hertz (Hz) cycles per second.

Microwave frequencies range from one billion cycles per second, which is 1 Gigahertz (GHz), upward to 100 GHz.   Here is a listing of Microwave Frequency Bands.

Source

[ISM: Industrial, Scientific and Medical band]

Another caution Firstenberg offers is:

But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors.

[CJF emphasis]

Firstenberg claims,

The higher the frequency, the greater the bandwidth—but the smaller the waves. Base stations have to be very close together—100 meters [300 feet] apart in cities—and they have to blast out their signals in order to get them inside homes and buildings. And the only way to do this economically is with phased arrays and focused beams that are aimed directly at their targets. What happens to birds that fly through the beams, the FCC does not say. And what happens to utility workers who climb utility poles and work next to these structures every day? A 30,000-watt beam will cook an egg, or an eye, at a distance of a few feet.

Source“5G – From Blankets To Bullets” Arthur Firstenberg

How familiar are consumers with the unknowns about 5G and other microwave technologies vested interests and stakeholders are not divulging?

A ‘raft’ of bills has been introduced into the current Congress to promote 5G, which consumers ought to know about.  Click on bill numbers for more information about each bill.

H.R.4814 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To amend the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to preserve and protect the ability of local governments to provide broadband capability and services.

H.R.4847 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Broadband  Deployment Streamlining Act

H.R.4842 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that the Federal Communications Commission is not required to perform any review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 or division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, as a condition of permitting the placement and installation of a communications facility, and for other purposes.

H.R.4795 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Communications Facilities Deployment on Federal Property Act of 2018

H.R.4839 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To provide for the establishment of an inventory of Federal assets to provide information to entities that construct or operate communications facilities or provide communications service.

H.R.4824 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To allow certain State permitting authority to encourage expansion of  broadband  service to rural communities, and for other purposes.

H.R.4817 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to make grants for the establishment or expansion of internet exchange facilities, and for other purposes.

H.R.4813 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study to evaluate the role of unlicensed spectrum in offloading  broadband  traffic, and for other purposes.

H.R.4810 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

To direct the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to carry out activities relating to the development and maintenance of a  broadband  inventory map through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and not through an agreement with any other agency.

H.R.4506 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Jobs for Tribes Act

H.R.4800 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Broadband Conduit Deployment Act of 2018

H.R.4798 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Inventory of Assets for Communications Facilities Act of 2018

H.R.4782 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands Equitable Rebuild Act of 2018

H.R. 4760  — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Securing America’s Future Act of 2018

H.R.4858 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

CLIMB ONCE Act

H.R.4832 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

RESTORED Act of 2018

H.R.4824 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

Rural Broadband Permitting Efficiency Act of 2018

Apparently, lobbyists have been working hard to get wireless bills introduced and eventually passed.

If you are negatively impacted by wireless radiation—electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) or idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI)—and would like to testify before a Congressional hearing about it during any of the hearings for the above bills, contact the particular committee to which each bill has been referred to on Capitol Hill, Washington, DC, and inform those staffers on that specific committee about your willingness to testify.

References:

[1] https://www.drperlmutter.com/brain-needs-cholesterol/
[2] https://www.aaemonline.org/emf_rf_position.php
[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780531/
[4] http://microwavenews.com/news-tags/blood-brain-barrier
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3575652


This article was originally published by The Activist Post, written by Catherine J. Frompovich.  Our archive of articles from The Activist Post can be viewed here.

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.